Tu sais que l'ESP32 Cam fait cela aussi?
J'ai posé la question au YouTuber DroneBot pour savoir quelle différence il y avait entre une ESP32 Cam et un HuskyLens, voici sa réponse.
They are by no means the same. While the 32-bit ESP32-CAM is capable of simple recognition tasks, it has nowhere the power of the 64-bit Kendryte K210. It certainly can't recognize a cow, and programming it to track an object is difficult (but not impossible).
Also, the HuskyLens is meant to be used as an external sensor, while the ESP32-CAM is a microcontroller with I/O ports, WiFi and Bluetooth. So they aren't even really in the same category.
A better comparison would be to compare the HuskyLens with the Pixy 2 camera, a much older technology. The HuskyLens is much more powerful, and cheaper too.
Not to mention that the ESP32-CAM doesn't come with a 2-inch display, which is where a lot of the cost of the HuskyLens is incorporated.
But your friend is correct about one thing, the ESP32-CAM is much cheaper. You can buy five of them for the price of one HuskyLens. But, again, you are really comparing two different categories of device.
The real beauty of a device like the HuskyLens is what I referred to at the beginning of the video - it's an "edge computing" device. So it does all the hard work, making it easier for the microcontroller.
I'll be reviewing some more similar sensors that use the Kendryte K210, these are from Seeedstudio, and they bring out many of the K210 I/O pins. I have three of them, and one of them even has an ESP-32 onboard for wireless connectivity.